Last night, I was honored when Sidney Powell called me and asked me to serve as lead counsel for her in defending the frivolous defamation lawsuit filed against her by Dominion.
I quickly accepted. Get ready to rumble, Dominion. You made a mistake suing Sidney. You are going to pay a heavy price.
Sidney and I will not be intimidated. We will not go quietly in the night.
Hey Dominion, I will see you and your employees and officers soon as truth is pursued and established. I will see you across the table where you will be subjected to a thorough and sifting cross-examination under oath. I know how to deal with legal bullies like you.
. ／l
l l ／ ヽ、／ヽ
. ､ ヽ / / ､ ヽ ⌒ ヽ
ー- 'l l / /＼ ∧ l l l
l l ∧ ﾘ l l ヽ_ L__∨ l l l l
/ l /≡乍l. l l 彡≡≡≡∨ l l l l
_／ l /´,-二ヽ l .l ' ／二ミヽlｿ l l し 現在、アメリカのクリスマスカードで
ー┤ y l .:::，:ヽ l l l ::::，::: ﾚ l lゝ--' クリスマスおめでとうという意味で使われる言葉です。
l l ｿ l ::::::: ヽﾐ__l ヽ ::::::: ｿ l l)) l
l l l ﾞ --- ' ､ -- ' l l lｿ l
ヽ __,,.. ．-‐{ l ｿ ／ｿ ＼＿,
l_ __r-ヾ,:::::::::::::λ __ ﾘ ｿr-く_/ ﾞ --ソ
l ~""/ ）=,＞l----'ﾞ￣ﾞﾞﾞ )イl r ' ヽゝ--'
l レ┤'´,┴, l ヽｿ--┴, l ヽr、ﾞー'丿
-' rl ⊃_ '┬---l l /､ー--<
人ヽ___)====l====b l、/ ﾞ===/
'ヾ､二-'──┴──┤､ /
“These challenges are part of putting on races in a big city - we’re are just going to get on with preparing to compete.
これらの水質の課題は、大都市でレースを行うときの一部ですので、我々は競技の準備をします。
This week, local residents complained to Japanese media that the bay smelled like a toilet, fuelling concerns of elevated levels of the dangerous E-coli bacteria which is found in sewerage.
今週、地元住民は、「湾がトイレのようなにおいがして、下水道で見つかる大腸菌が危険なレベルまで上昇する懸念がある」と日本のマスメディアに不満を漏らしました。
The problem is not without precedent - athletes in outdoor water events at the 2016 Rio de Janeiro Olympics in Brazil faced severe pollution in venues for rowing, sailing, canoeing, open-water swimming, and triathlon.
その問題は前例がないわけではありません。
ブラジルで開催された2016年リオ・オリンピックの屋外ウォーターイベントのアスリート（ボート、セーリング、カヌー、オープンウォータースイミング、トライアスロン）は、会場で深刻な汚染に直面しました。
I wanna speak today - a(?) foreign situation of Afghanistan
今日は話したいことがある アフガニスタンの海外事情です。
The development that have taken place on last week and the steps we're taking to address the rapidly evolving events.
先週行われた開発(?) と、急速に進行する事態に対応するためのステップをご紹介します。
My national security team and I have been closely monitoring the situation on the ground in Afghanistan
and moving quickly to execute the plans we had put in place
to respond to every constituency and contingency including the rapid collapse we're seeing now.
私の国家安全保障チームと私は、アフガニスタンの現場の状況を注意深く監視し、
現在見られる急速な崩壊を含め、あらゆる構成要素や不測の事態に対応するために用意した計画を実行するために迅速に行動してきました。
I'll speak more in a moment about the specific steps we're taking
but I want to remind everyone how we got here
and what america's interests are in Afghanistan.
具体的な取り組みについては後ほどお話ししますが、
ここに至るまでの経緯と、
アフガニスタンにおけるアメリカの関心事を皆さんにお伝えしたいと思います。
We went to Afghanistan alomost 20 years ago
with clear goals,
私たちは約20年前、明確な目標を持ってアフガニスタンに行った。
get those who attacked us on september 11, 2001
2001年9月11日に米国を攻撃した人々を捕らえるために
and
さらに、
make sure al-Qaida could not use Afghanistan as a base from which to attack us again.
アルカイダがアフガニスタンを拠点として再び我々を攻撃できないようにすることでした。
We did that.
私たちはそうしました。
We severely degraded al-Qaida in Afghanistan.
私たちは、アフガニスタンのアルカイダを徹底的に弱体化させました。
We never gave up the hunt for Osama bin laden and we got him.
That was a decade ago.
オサマ・ビンラディンの捜索をあきらめずに行い、彼を捕らえた。
それは10年前のことです。
Our mission in Afghanistan was never supposed to have been nation building.
アフガニスタンでの我々の任務は、国家建設ではなかったはずです。
It was never supposed to be creating a unified, centralized democracy.
統一された中央集権的な民主主義を構築することは想定していませんでした。
Our only vital interests in Afghanistan remains today what has always been
preventing a terrorist attack on american homeland.
アフガニスタンにおける我々の唯一の重要な関心事は、今日もこれまでと同様に、
アメリカ本土へのテロ攻撃を防ぐことにあります。
I've argued for many years that our mission should be narrowly focused on counter terrorism, not counter or nation building.
私は長年にわたり、我々の使命はテロ対策に限定されるべきであり、反撃や国家建設ではないと主張してきました。
That's why aposed serge when I know what inplosion 2009 when I was by president.
(丸々Youtube字幕が抜ける個所がある……？ 全然自信無い。2009とプレジデントがあったのは確かだと思う)
That's why as president I'm adamant we focus on the threats we face today in 2021, not yesterday's threats.
だからこそ、私は大統領として、昨日までの脅威ではなく、2021年に直面する今日の脅威に焦点を当てることを固く決意しています。
Today the terrorist threat has metastasized well beyond Afghanistan.
現在、テロの脅威はアフガニスタン以外にも広がっています。
Al-Shabaab in Somalia,
al-Qaida in the iranian peninsula,
(アンヌーサリースリア？ とか聞こえるのが挟まる)
ISIS attempting to create a call fate in Syria and Iraq
and establishing affiliates in multiple countries in Africa and Asia.
ソマリアのアル・シャバブ、
イラン半島のアル・カイダ、
シリアとイラクで呼応関係を作ろうとしているISIS、
そしてアフリカとアジアの複数の国に関連会社(≒反社組織？)を設立している。
There threats warrant our attention and our resources.
これらの脅威は、我々の注意と資源を必要とするものです。
We conduct effective counter terrorism missions
against terrorist groups from multiple countries
where we don't have permanent military presence.
私たちは、効果的なテロ対策ミッションを実施しています。
複数の国のテロリストグループに対して。
恒久的な軍事的プレゼンスを持たない複数の国の。(プレゼンスどう訳すか分からん)
If necessary, we'll do the same in Afghanistan.
必要であれば、アフガニスタンでも同じことをします。
We developed counter terrorism over the horizon capability
that will allow us to keep our eyes firmly fixed on the direct threats of the United States and the region
and act quickly and decisively if needed.
私たちは、水平線を越えたテロ対策能力を開発しました。
それは、米国と地域の直接的な脅威にしっかりと目を向け、
必要に応じて迅速かつ断固とした行動をとることができます。
When I came into office,
I inherited a deal that president trump negotiated with the Taliban.
私が就任したとき、
私はトランプ大統領がタリバンと交渉した取引を継承しました。
Under his agreement U.S. Forces will be out of Afghanistan by May 1, 2021.
この合意に基づき、米軍は2021年5月1日までにアフガニスタンから撤退します。
Just a little over three months after I took office.
U.S. Forces had already drawn down from the Trump administration from roughly 15,000 American forces.
就任してからわずか3ヶ月あまり。
米軍はすでにトランプ政権からおよそ15,000人の米軍を撤退させていました。
(drawn down 【drain】 みたいに聞こえる…… あと15,00【5】 に聞こえる)
2,500 troops in country
and the Taliban has strongest military since 2001.
(またYoutube字幕が抜けた)
2,500人の部隊が駐留しており、
タリバンは2001年以降、軍事的に最も強い状態にありました。
The choice I had to make
as your president
was either to follow through on that agreement
or be prepared to go back to fighting the Taliban
in the middle of the Spring fighting season.
私が、貴方方の大統領として選択しなければならなかったのは、
この合意を実行するか、
それともタリバンとの戦いに戻る覚悟をするかということでした。
春の戦闘シーズンの最中に。
(春闘シーズン……？)
There was no agreement of protecting our forces after May 1.
There is no status quo of stability without American casualties after May 1.
There was only cold reality of following through on the agreement to withdraw our forces or escalating the conflict and sending 1000 more American troops back into combat in Afghanistan.
Lunching into the third decade of conflict.
I stand squarely behind my decision.
After 20 years I've learned the hard way that there was never a good time to withdraw U.S. Forces.
That's why we're still there.
We were clear-eyed about the risk.
We planned for every contingency, but I always promised the American people that I'll be straight with you.
The truth is this did unfold more quickly than we had anticipated.
So what's happend?
Afghanistan political leaders gave up and fled the country.
The Afghanistan military collapsed some time without trying to fight.
If anything, the developments of the past week reinforced that any U.S. military involvement in Afghanistan now was the right decision.
American troops cannot and should not be fighting in a war and dying in a war that Afghan Forces are not willing to fight for themselves.
We spent over $1 trillion.
We trained and equipped an Afghan military force of some 300,000 strong.
Incredibly well equipped.
A force larger in size than the militaries of many of our NATO Allies.
We gave them every tool they could need.
We paid their salaries, provided for the maintenance of their air force, something the Taliban doesn't have.
Taliban does not have an air force.
You provided close air support.
We gave them every chance to determine their own future.
We could not provide them was the will to fight for that future.
Some very brave and capable Afghans special forces units and soldiers.
If Afghanistan is unable to mount any real resistance to the Taliban now, there is no chance that one year, one more year, five more years or 20 more years, U.S. military boots on the ground would have made any difference.
Here's what I believe to my core, it is wrong to order American troops to step up when Afghanistan's own armed forces would not.
Political leaders of Afghanistan were unable to come together for the good of their people, unable to negotiate for the future of their country when the chips were down.
They would never have done so while U.S. troops remained in Afghanistan bearing the brunt of the fighting for them.
And our two strategic competitors, China and Russia, would love nothing more than the United States to continue to funnel billions of dollars in resources and attention into stabilizing Afghanistan indefinitely.
When I hosted president Ghani at the white house in June and again when I spoke by phone to Ghani in July we had very frank conversations.
We talked abount how Afghanistan should prepare to fight their civil wars after the U.S. military departs, to clean up the corruption in government so the government could function for the Afghan people.
We talked extensively about the need for Afghan leaders to unite politically.
I also urge them to engage in diplomacy, to seek a political settlement with the Taliban.
This advice was flatley refused.
Mr. Ghani insisted the Afghan forces would fight but obviously he was wrong.
Left again to ask of those who argue that we should stay, how many more generations of America's daughters and sons would you have me send to fight Afghanistan's civil war when Afghan troops will not?
How many more lives, American lives, is it worth?
How many endless roads of head stones at arlington national cemetery?
I'm clear on my answer.
I will not repeat the mistakes we've made in the past, mistake of staying, fighting indefinitely for a conflict not in the national interest of the United States, of doubling down on a civil war in a foreign country, of attempting to remaining country to the endless military developments of U.S. Forces.
Those are the mistakes we cannot continue to repeat because we have significant vital interests in the world that we cannot afford to ignore.
I also want to acknowledge how painful this is to so many.
Seems we're seeing in Afghanistan -- the scenes we're seeing in Afghanistan are gut-wrenching particularly for our veterans, diplomats, humanitarian workers, for anyone who has spent time on the ground working to support the Afghan people, for those who have lost loved ones in Afghanistan and for Americans who have fought and served in the country, serve our country in Afghanistan.
This is deeply deeply personal.
This for me as well.
I've worked on these issues as long as anyone.
I've been throughout Afghanistan during this war while the war was going on, from Kabul to Kandahar to the Kunar valley.
I've traveled on four different occasions.
I met with the people, I've spoken to the leaders.
I spent time with our troops and I came to understand first hand what was and was not possible in Afghanistan.
So now we're focused on what is possible.
We will continue to support the Afghan people.
We will lead with our diplomacy, our international influence and humanitarian AID.
We'll continue to push for regional diplomacy and engagement against violence and instability.
We'll continue to speak out for the basic rights of Afghan people, of women and girls, just as we speak out all over the world.
I've been clear human rights must be the center of our foreign policy, not the periphery.
But the way to do it is not through endless military deployments.
It's with our diplomacy, our economic tool and rallying the world to join us.
Let me lay out the current mission in Afghanistan.
I was asked to authorize and I did 6,000 U.S. troops to Afghanistan for the purpose of assisting the departure of U.S. and allied civilian personnel from Afghanistan and to evacuate our Afghan allies and vulnerable Afghans to safety outside of Afghanistan.
Our troops are working to secure the air field and ensure continued operation both the civilian and military flights.
We're taking over air traffic control.
We have safely shut down our embassy and transferred our diplomats.
Our diplomatic presence is now consolidated at the airport as well.
Over the coming days we intend to transport out thousands of American citizens who have been living and working in Afghanistan.
We'll also continue to support the safe departure civilian personnel, civilian personnel of our allies who are still serving in Afghanistan.
Operation allies REV JEW which I announced back in July has already moved 2000 Afghans who are eligible for special immigration visas and their families to the United States.
In the coming days U.S. military will provide assistance to move more SIB eligible Afghans and their families out of Afghanistan.
We're also expanding refugee access to cover other vulnerable Afghans who worked for our embassy.
U.S. non-government agency or the U.S. non-governmenttal organization and Afghans who otherwise are at great risk and U.S. news agencies.
I know there are concerns about why we did not begin evacuating Afghan civilians sooner.
Part of the answer some of the Afghans did not want to leave earlier, still hopeful for their country.
Partly because the Afghan government and its supporters discouraged us from organizing a mass exodus to avoid triggering as they said crisis confidence.
American troops are performing this mission as professionally and as effectively as they always do.
But it is not without risk.
As we carry out this departure, we have made it clear to the Taliban if they attack our personnel or disrupt our operation, the U.S. presence will be swift and the response will be swift and forceful.
We will defend our perople with devastating force, if necessary.
Our current military mission will be short in time, limited in scope and focused in its objectives.
Yet our people and our allies as safely, as quickly as possible and once we have completed this mission, we will conclude our military with drawal, we'll end America's longest war after 20 long years of blood shed.
The events we're seeing now are sadly proof that no amount of military force would ever deliver a stable, united, secure Afghanistan.
That's known in history as the graveyard of empires.
What's happening now could just as easily happen five years ago or 15 years in the future.
You have to be honest, our mission in Afghanistan has taken many missteps, made many missteps over the past two decades.
I'm now the fourth American president to preside over gar in Afghanistan, two democrats and two republicans.
I will not pass this responsibility on to a fifth president.
I will not mislead the American people by claiming that just a little more time in Afghanistan will make all the difference, nor will I shrink from my share of responsibility for where we are today and how we must move forward from here.
I am president of the United States of America and the buck stops with me.
I'm deeply saddend by the facts we now face.
But I do not regret my decision to end America's war fighting in Afghanistan and maintain a laser focus on our counter terrorism mission there and other parts of the world, a mission to degrade the terrorist threat of al-Qaida in Afghanistan and kill Osama bin laden was a success from a decades long effort to overcome centuries of history and permanently change and remaining Afghanistan was not, and I wrote and believed it never could be.
I cannot and will not ask our troops to fight on endlessly in another country's civil war, taking casualty, suffering life-shattering injuries, leaving families broken by grief and loss.
This is not in our national security interests.
It is not what the American people want.
It is not what you're troops who have sacrificed so much over the past two decades deserve.
I made a commitment to the American people when I ran for president that I would bring America's military involvement in Afghanistan to an end.
While it's been hard and messy and yes far from perfect, I've honored that commitment.
More Importantly I made a commitment to the brave men and women who serve this nation that I wasn't going to ask them to continue to risk their lives in the military action that should have ended long ago.
Our leaders did that in Vietnam when I got here as a young man.
I vill not do it in Afghanistan.
I know my decision will be criticized.
But I would rather take all that criticism and pass this decision on to another president of the United States, yet another one, a fifth one, because it's the right one, the right decision for our people, the right one for our brief service members who risked their lives serving our nation, and it's the right one for America.
Thank you and GOD protect our troops, our diplomats, all brave Americans serving in harm's way.
*2 Garfield, Eugene (June 1998).
“The Impact Factor and Using It Correctly”. Der Unfallchirurg 101 (6): 413?414. PMID 9677838.
ttp://www.garfield.library.upenn.edu/papers/derunfallchirurg_v101(6)p413y1998english.html
. ／l
l l ／ ヽ、／ヽ その航路帯で運ばなければならない物資の量は、
. ､ ヽ / / ､ ヽ ⌒ ヽ 平時の輸入量(1980年当時)の1／3に当たる年間2億トン
ー- 'l l / /＼ ∧ l l l
l l ∧ ﾘ l l ヽ_ L__∨ l l l l それだけの物資を運ぶ為に必要な船団と船舶数は、
/ l /≡乍l. l l 彡≡≡≡∨ l l l l 月間50隻船団を8個。計400隻
_／ l /´,-二ヽ l .l ' ／二ミヽlｿ l l し
ー┤ y l .:::，:ヽ l l l ::::，::: ﾚ l lゝ--' 数理的研究によって弾き出された
l l ｿ l ::::::: ヽﾐ__l ヽ ::::::: ｿ l l)) l 50隻船団を護衛するのに必要な
l l l ﾞ --- ' ､ -- ' l l lｿ l 護衛艦の必要最小限の数は、8隻。
ヽ __,,.. ．-‐{ l ｿ ／ｿ ＼＿,
l_ __r-ヾ,:::::::::::::λ __ ﾘ ｿr-く_/ ﾞ --ソ 護衛艦のみでは対処が困難な
l ~""/ ）=,＞l----'ﾞ￣ﾞﾞﾞ )イl r ' ヽゝ--' 原子力潜水艦(護衛艦以上の速力)に対処する為には、
l レ┤'´,┴, l ヽｿ--┴, l ヽr、ﾞー'丿
-' rl ⊃_ '┬---l l /､ー--< それよりも優速な対潜水艦ヘリコプターを
人ヽ___)====l====b l、/ ﾞ===/ 4 機同時に投入する事が必要であり
'ヾ､二-'──┴──┤､ / 補給・予備機も入れて
対潜水艦ヘリコプターは、6機必要(＊1)
