1. International sporting eventsは、
The major argument against 〜 is financial.
Typically, it can cost several million pounds to 〜
This money, it is argued, would be better spent on welfare and education programmes that provide direct support for the population.
Indeed, some governments have incurred so much debt through 〜ing 〜 that they have had to reduce spending on other social programmes.
if the authorities plan carefully, they can use the occasion of the 〜 to help finance public works that benefit the whole population in the long term.
However, if a government wishes to 〜 it should ensure it has sufficient funds to maintain spending on other projects.
2. Museumsは、
One very complex issue in today’s world is the funding of 〜. While there is an argument that they should be free to the general public and funded by governments, I also believe that there is also a case for saying that they should 〜
The first argument is that institutions like 〜 are a public service and therefore there should be free access to the man in the street.
Governments do not have sufficient funds to subsidise all such institutions and there are other priorities for public money.
3. Space explorationは、
There has always been considerable discussion about whether governments should spend tax payers’ money on 〜. In my view it is impossible to justify the amount of money spent on such projects. Generally speaking, the main reason for this position is that there are several areas in which the money could be invested better.
The first point to make is that politicians have a responsibility to spend public money on projects that bring a benefit to the general public. For example, it is not of great value to the general public that 〜. This does not merit the huge amount of money spent.
The second point to make is that there are many much more urgent projects on 〜 that require investment.
If governments spent less money on 〜, then they would be able to help solve some of these problems such as population control, elimination of diseases like cholera, global warming and food shortages.
My conclusion is that politicians should not fund 〜.
The grounds for saying this are that it is very costly and provides few real benefits. Furthermore, there are several more urgent issues that need to be funded.
