1. There is a missile pod, canopy, on the undercarriage of this aircraft.
2. That it shoots out a missile before impact.
3. That because of 1 & 2, it is logical and even obvious that this special 767 isn't the same 767 that took off from Bostons Logan International that morning. This is a fact.
4. That because of 1, 2 & 3, one other 'Fact' is also glaringly obvious. The 767 that took off from Bostons Logan, was switched, and that this 767 you see with a pod, and shooting a missile out, is the plane that took it's place. This occurred when the transponder of the aircraft was turned off.
And that's enough. Which is the point of this website. We can all argue about the finer details of all that really took place on 911 AFTER we round up those responsible and do to them as Law prescribes. Thus the name, LetsRoll911.org! Come on people, our Nation has been hijacked, it's time to take it back! Lets Roll America!
But suffice it to say for now that the pod does exist, and can be clearly seen in all the news footage from 911 at the 2nd World Trade Center. Look below and see for yourself what CNN missed on 911 and has missed ever since.
Several websites have garnered worldwide attention recently for exposing apparent evidence of a 'pod missile' which was fired from Flight 175 before it hit the WTC South Tower.
1.In both cases, any resulting fire was not, in and of itself, enough to bring down the towers.
In fact, the available evidence is inconsistent with a raging 700 degree fire that has been
frequently hypothesized as the cause of the collapse
2. It was the force exerted by the impact of the planes which ultimately doomed the towers.
The plane that hit the North Tower almost certainly took out the core supporting structures
of at least three floors, causing the floors above them to sag. The plane that hit the South
tower probably took out all of the core supports for at least 4 and probably 6 floors, as well
as severely weakening the southeast corner of the building.
3. As the fire weakened the supporting columns, this effect would have become more exaggerated
until the floors collapsed on top of each other pancake-style.
The collapse of the WTC
Letter by Kevin Ryan ・Underwriters Laboratories November 11, 2004
The following letter was sent today by Kevin Ryan of Underwriters Laboratories to Frank Gayle of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Underwriters Laboratories is the company that certified the steel componets used in the constuction of the World Trade Center towers. The information in this letter is of great importance.
Dr. Gayle,
Having recently reviewed your team's report of 10/19/04, I felt the need to contact you directly.
As I'm sure you know, the company I work for certified the steel components used in the construction of the WTC buildings. In requesting information from both our CEO and Fire Protection business manager last year, I learned that they did not agree on the essential aspects of the story, except for one thing - that the samples we certified met all requirements. They suggested we all be patient and understand that UL was working with your team, and that tests would continue through this year. I'm aware of UL's attempts to help, including performing tests on models of the floor assemblies. But the results of these tests appear to indicate that the buildings should have easily withstood the thermal stress caused by pools of burning jet fuel.
There continues to be a number of "experts" making public claims about how the WTC buildings fell. One such person, Dr. Hyman Brown from the WTC construction crew, claims that the buildings collapsed due to fires at 2000F melting the steel (1). He states "What caused the building to collapse is the airplane fuel・urning at 2,000 degrees Fahrenheit. The steel in that five-floor area melts." Additionally, the newspaper that quotes him says "Just-released preliminary findings from a National Institute of Standards and Technology study of the World Trade Center collapse support Brown痴 theory."
We know that the steel components were certified to ASTM E119. The time temperature curves for this standard require the samples to be exposed to temperatures around 2000F for several hours. And as we all agree, the steel applied met those specifications. Additionally, I think we can all agree that even un-fireproofed steel will not melt until reaching red-hot temperatures of nearly 3000F (2). Why Dr. Brown would imply that 2000F would melt the high-grade steel used in those buildings makes no sense at all.
The results of your recently published metallurgical tests seem to clear things up (3), and support your team's August 2003 update as detailed by the Associated Press (4), in which you were ready to "rule out weak steel as a contributing factor in the collapse." The evaluation of paint deformation and spheroidization seem very straightforward, and you noted that the samples available were adequate for the investigation. Your comments suggest that the steel was probably exposed to temperatures of only about 500F (250C), which is what one might expect from a thermodynamic analysis of the situation.
However the summary of the new NIST report seems to ignore your findings, as it suggests that these low temperatures caused exposed bits of the building痴 steel core to "soften and buckle." (5) Additionally this summary states that the perimeter columns softened, yet your findings make clear that "most perimeter panels (157 of 160) saw no temperature above 250C." To soften steel for the purposes of forging, normally temperatures need to be above1100C (6). However, this new summary report suggests that much lower temperatures were be able to not only soften the steel in a matter of minutes, but lead to rapid structural collapse.
This story just does not add up. If steel from those buildings did soften or melt, I知 sure we can all agree that this was certainly not due to jet fuel fires of any kind, let alone the briefly burning fires in those towers. That fact should be of great concern to all Americans. Alternatively, the contention that this steel did fail at temperatures around 250C suggests that the majority of deaths on 9/11 were due to a safety-related failure. That suggestion should be of great concern to my company.
There is no question that the events of 9/11 are the emotional driving force behind the War on Terror. And the issue of the WTC collapse is at the crux of the story of 9/11. My feeling is that your metallurgical tests are at the crux of the crux of the crux. Either you can make sense of what really happened to those buildings, and communicate this quickly, or we all face the same destruction and despair that come from global decisions based on disinformation and 田hatter・
Thanks for your efforts to determine what happened on that day. You may know that there are a number of other current and former government employees that have risked a great deal to help us to know the truth. I've copied one of these people on this message as a sign of respect and support. I believe your work could also be a nucleus of fact around which the truth, and thereby global peace and justice, can grow again. Please do what you can to quickly eliminate the confusion regarding the ability of jet fuel fires to soften or melt structural steel.
1. www.boulderweekly.com/archive/102104/coverstory.html 2. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 61st edition, pg D-187 3.http://wtc.nist.gov/media/P3MechanicalandMetAnalysisofSteel.pdf 4. www.voicesofsept11.org/archive/911ic/082703.php 5.http://wtc.nist.gov/media/NCSTACWTCStatusFINAL101904WEB2.pdf (pg 11) 6. www.forging.org/FIERF/pdf/ffaaMacSleyne.pdf
WTCは爆弾によって倒壊。もはや定説
Zero Doubt - WTC Towers
Brought Down By Explosives
2-7-5
"The flashlight led us into Borders bookstore, up an escalator, and out to Church Street. The explosions were going off everywhere. I was convinced that there were bombs planted all over the place and someone was sitting at a control panel pushing detonator buttons. I was afraid to go down Church Street towards Broadway, but I had to do it. I ended up on Vesey Street. There was another explosion. And another. I didn't know which way to run." --Teresa Veliz, Survivor
地下爆破証言とブッシュ・サイエンス
Two More WTC Workers Come Forward, One Seriously Burned And The
Other Hurt While Trapped In Basement Elevator, Both Claiming Massive
Explosion Took Place In Lower Levels Of North Tower On 9/11 http://www.arcticbeacon.com/articles/article/1518131/29110.htm
