The Pentagon attack:
How the "no plane" theories are used to discredit 9/11 skepticism and
distract from proven evidence of complicity. http://www.oilempire.us/pentagon.html
"A honey pot, in intelligence jargon, is a tempting source of information or 'dangle' that is set out to lure intended victims into a trap. Ultimately the honey pot is violently and maliciously discredited so as to destroy the credibility of anything stuck to it by association." (Michael Ruppert, "Crossing the Rubicon," p. 184)
Now what we see here is debris being pushed away from the hole.
The steel columns near the impact are not pushed in but pushed sideways, like what would happen if a bomb went off, not like what would happen if a plane hit it.
You can see a hole big enough for the fuselage possibly on the left,
However there hole the claimed hole it made is to the right,
which clearly could not possibly fit the fuselage of a 757 through it.
It is also important to note that there is no wing damage to the building at all.
By all rights if the wings could take out Light Poles, beams shouldn't even be there,
wouldn't you think? The smoke covers up the arching hole, so it is difficult to get a clear understanding of what the damage really is.
It also makes me wonder if perhaps we are seeing 2 impact points, not one.
The damage to right side of the picture looks like it could have been a explosion that occurred in the building,
while to the left, that arching aspect looks like it may have been an impact point. http://www.asile.org/citoyens/numero13/pentagone/erreurs.htm
